← All case studies
Agribusiness · B2B Demand Generation

B2B Lead Generation on LinkedIn and SEO for a Kenyan Agribusiness Exporter

Anonymised descriptor: fresh produce agribusiness exporter based near Nairobi

5.6x qualified buyer leads
34% lower cost per lead
3 new export markets opened

Context

The client exports fresh produce, primarily avocados and French beans, from farms and aggregation centers around Nairobi and the central highlands to buyers in Europe and the Middle East. Their business had grown steadily for a decade almost entirely through trade shows, existing importer relationships, and referrals within a fairly closed network of produce buyers. Digital marketing did not exist as a discipline inside the company. There was a static website that functioned as a digital business card and a LinkedIn page that the general manager posted to occasionally between harvest seasons.

The trigger for engaging us was a supply glut moment familiar to anyone in Kenyan horticulture: a strong harvest season with capacity to fulfil more export volume than their existing buyer relationships could absorb, alongside a strategic push to diversify beyond their two largest export markets, which represented a concentration risk the board had flagged. They allocated a modest B2B marketing budget of around KES 600,000 per month, small by any international standard, but meaningful for a category where most competitors spent nothing at all on digital demand generation.

The Problem

Sourcing decisions in fresh produce export are relationship and trust driven, and buyers, whether European supermarket procurement teams or Middle Eastern distributors, typically vet a new supplier's certifications, consistency of supply, and cold chain capability long before any commercial conversation happens. The client's website could not answer any of those questions. There was no clear presentation of certifications, no case material showing consistent volume delivery, and no content addressing the practical concerns a procurement manager has before adding a new supplier to a shortlist.

LinkedIn, the channel where much of this buyer research actually happens, was essentially dormant. The company had no presence in the conversations happening among produce buyers and sourcing consultants, and search visibility was close to zero for the terms international buyers actually used, which we found leaned heavily toward specific certification names, port and shipping terms, and variety specific sourcing queries rather than generic brand terms.

There was also an internal capacity problem. The sales team, two people handling both existing accounts and new business, had no structured way to qualify inbound interest, which meant that early digital enquiries, when they did trickle in, were sometimes handled slower than the buyer's own internal timeline required.

What We Did

  1. Built a buyer focused website rebuild. We restructured the site around the questions a procurement buyer actually asks, certifications held, farm and aggregation capacity, cold chain and logistics process, and past export volumes by market, replacing generic marketing language with specifics a sourcing manager could act on.

  2. Ran an SEO program targeting sourcing intent keywords. We researched and built content around the actual search behavior of international produce buyers, terms tied to specific certifications, Kenyan growing regions, and variety specific export queries, since generic terms like Kenya avocado exporter had far more competition and far less buying intent than the specific technical queries buyers actually typed.

  3. Established a consistent LinkedIn presence for the general manager and the company page. We built a content calendar mixing harvest updates, certification milestones, and short explainers on Kenyan horticulture supply chains, posted consistently rather than sporadically, and used LinkedIn's native tools to identify and connect with sourcing and procurement contacts at target companies in new markets.

  4. Ran targeted LinkedIn outreach and paid campaigns into new markets. Alongside organic content, we ran a modest paid LinkedIn campaign specifically targeting procurement and sourcing job titles in the Middle East and a small set of new European markets the client wanted to enter, promoting a short capability overview asset rather than a generic company brochure.

  5. Built a lead qualification and handoff process. We introduced a simple scoring framework for inbound enquiries based on stated volume needs, target market, and certification requirements, and set a response time standard so the two person sales team could triage quickly rather than treating every enquiry the same.

  6. Created a quarterly trade show amplification plan. Since the client still attended two major international trade shows a year, we built pre show LinkedIn outreach to book meetings in advance and post show content to extend the reach of conversations that would otherwise have ended when the show closed.

Results

Qualified buyer leads, meaning enquiries from contacts with a verifiable procurement role and a stated sourcing need matching the client's product range, grew 5.6x over the twelve month engagement, with LinkedIn overtaking trade shows as the single largest source of new buyer conversations by month eight. Cost per qualified lead fell 34% as we narrowed paid targeting to the job titles and regions that were actually converting into real conversations rather than casting a wide net.

Most significantly for the client's board level goal, the pipeline built through this period led to active commercial conversations in three new export markets that had not previously appeared anywhere in the client's pipeline, directly addressing the market concentration risk that had prompted the engagement.

What We Would Do Differently

We spent too long in the first quarter trying to make generic SEO terms work before pivoting to the specific, technical sourcing queries that actually drove buyer traffic, and with the benefit of hindsight we would have run that keyword research more rigorously before writing a single page of content. We would also have introduced the lead scoring and response time framework from day one rather than month three, since a handful of early enquiries were handled inconsistently before that process existed, and at least one buyer conversation stalled out due to a slow initial response that better process would have prevented.

Client identity withheld under a confidentiality agreement. Figures come from engagement reporting and are rounded.

Ready to build your own growth system?

Tell us your goals and we will show you exactly how we would approach it.

Book Your Free Strategy Call →